“I often find myself thinking that if liberals didn’t
have double standards, they wouldn’t have any
standards at all.”
“I often find myself thinking that if liberals didn’t
have double standards, they wouldn’t have any
standards at all.”
Burt Prelutsky
OK, so he didn’t say that he is an ant-Semite. I’m not sure where to start with this guy. He basically thinks we should just let all hell break loose in the Middle East. This guy has a really warped mind. I’ve heard him make statements about wiping people out that would have made Stalin proud. He definitely has a chip on his shoulder when it comes to Israel. You can see the anger in his demeanor when the subject comes up. This guy really is a weasel in so many ways. He has this arrogant way of calling everyone “sir” that really gets on my nerves. I just hope hope most people understand that the road this man thinks we should take is the road to hell. If we don’t back up the Israel against the genocidal Iranians, then we have no doubt learned nothing from history. And deserve reap all of the consequences.
O’reilly just had left-wing whack-job Ellis Hennican on. It was a continuation of the pounding that O’reilly gave Hennican last week on the waterboarding issue, minus most of the verbal heat. Still O’reilly really showed the kind of lunacy that the left and the Democrat party is dealing in these days.
O’reilly made the comparison, which I have heard others make, of the fact that while Obama is against waterboarding, he is at the same time blowing up innocent people in Pakistan along with the terrorists that are being targeted. Hennican came back with some mealymouthed B.S. about how these are difficult moral issues, but apparently to morons such as himself there is much less moral ambiguity to dunking a few maniacal terrorist or to the thousands of deaths that could have occured if said dunking hadn’t taken place. I.E., dunking terrorists bad, dead Americans good. I think all of this moral relativism being displayed by the Left is the centerpiece of the liberal cult I believe this group has grown into. Ann Coulter was the first person I know of to write this story up and publish it in her book Godless. I still haven’t gotten around to reading Godless. i tried once, but the introduction in the book was all over the place and I read a review later on that said once you get past the Introduction, the book takes off gloves and we finally get no-holds barred Coulter.
So, back to my point, that Liberalism has grown into a cult. Let’s just take the issue of abortion. Abortion is one of the holy grails of Liberalism. As I’ve grown older I’ve truly come to revile abortion for the evil that it is. But, if Liberals were honest, they would say that they see nothing evil about abortion. Some would be, most of the so-called Catholic Dems who support it would never be honest about it. I’ll never be able to understand why liberals are so married to this issue. There is no real stigma attached to a woman having a child out of wedlock in this day and age. Certainly nothing like it was before abortion became the law of the land. And so, there can only be one explanation for it. Convenience. Yeah, right. Convenience? I can’t really even to begin to fathom how libs can, in their own minds, manipulates the facts and come to the conclusion that adoption shouldn’t be the number one option for pregnant mothers. This all about convenience. Because it allows these woman, who are for the most part simply irresponsible people, to not make the tough choice and give their child up for adoption. I think another reason that Liberals see little if anything wrong with abortion is Evolution. Let’s face it, if we are only hairless apes, and we are related by blood to every living creature on the earth, then it isn’t much of a stretch to go from believing life is sacred to believing babies are disposable.
Evolution is the second holy grail of liberalism. I can’t say that I’ve fully understand this issue. I’d say that most of the people who say they are one hundred percent convinced on this issue don’t know what they are talking about. I am only convinced of this: That humans are not the product of evolution. Animals may or may not be another story. The Bible is clear that there was an Adam and Eve and they sinned. If there wasn’t and they didn’t then the Bible is simply a bunch of lies. Christ never would have had to come back and die for our sins. Either that or he died for ever living creature on the face of the earth. Oh, yeah. That makes sense. It probably would make to sense… To a liberal.

O’reilly just had left-wing whack-job Ellis Hennican on. It was a continuation of the pounding that O’reilly gave Hennican last week on the waterboarding issue, minus most of the verbal heat. Still O’reilly really showed the kind of lunacy that the left and the Democrat party is dealing in these days.
O’reilly made the comparison, which I have heard others make, of the fact that while Obama is against waterboarding, he is at the same time blowing up innocent people in Pakistan along with the terrorists that are being targeted. Hennican came back with some mealymouthed B.S. about how these are difficult moral issues, but apparently to morons such as himself there is much less moral ambiguity to dunking a few maniacal terrorist or to the thousands of deaths that could have occured if said dunking hadn’t taken place. I.E., dunking terrorists bad, dead Americans good. I think all of this moral relativism being displayed by the Left is the centerpiece of the liberal cult I believe this group has grown into. Ann Coulter was the first person I know of to write this story up and publish it in her book Godless. I still haven’t gotten around to reading Godless. i tried once, but the introduction in the book was all over the place and I read a review later on that said once you get past the Introduction, the book takes off gloves and we finally get no-holds barred Coulter.
So, back to my point, that Liberalism has grown into a cult. Let’s just take the issue of abortion. Abortion is one of the holy grails of Liberalism. As I’ve grown older I’ve truly come to revile abortion for the evil that it is. But, if Liberals were honest, they would say that they see nothing evil about abortion. Some would be, most of the so-called Catholic Dems who support it would never be honest about it. I’ll never be able to understand why liberals are so married to this issue. There is no real stigma attached to a woman having a child out of wedlock in this day and age. Certainly nothing like it was before abortion became the law of the land. And so, there can only be one explanation for it. Convenience. Yeah, right. Convenience? I can’t really even to begin to fathom how libs can, in their own minds, manipulates the facts and come to the conclusion that adoption shouldn’t be the number one option for pregnant mothers. This all about convenience. Because it allows these woman, who are for the most part simply irresponsible people, to not make the tough choice and give their child up for adoption. I think another reason that Liberals see little if anything wrong with abortion is Evolution. Let’s face it, if we are only hairless apes, and we are related by blood to every living creature on the earth, then it isn’t much of a stretch to go from believing life is sacred to believing babies are disposable.
Evolution is the second holy grail of liberalism. I can’t say that I’ve fully understand this issue. I’d say that most of the people who say they are one hundred percent convinced on this issue don’t know what they are talking about. I am only convinced of this: That humans are not the product of evolution. Animals may or may not be another story. The Bible is clear that there was an Adam and Eve and they sinned. If there wasn’t and they didn’t then the Bible is simply a bunch of lies. Christ never would have had to come back and die for our sins. Either that or he died for ever living creature on the face of the earth. Oh, yeah. That makes sense. It probably would make to sense… To a liberal.

Governor Ed Rendell was just on Neil Cavuto’s show on Fox News and he just made the incredible claim that all conservative economists supported the trillion dollar Obama Stimulus plan. Is anybody so stupid that they would actually believe that utterly false statement. It would have been nice to at least see some token opposition from Cavuto to this flat-out lie, but he let it slide. So, what is the truth. Well, three months ago the CATO Institute took out full page ads in the Washington Post and New York Times opposing Obama’s massive stimulus plan. The ad was in the form of a letter signed by some 200 economists, three of whom are Nobel Laureates- Edward Prescott, Vernon Smith, and James Buchanan. The ad quotes Obama saying, “There is no disagreement that we need action by our government, a recovery plan that will help jumpstart the economy.” Gee, funny how all these liberals get the same facts wrong over and over again. Oh, I forgot. Facts are to liberals what Kryptonite is to Superman. The two just don’t mix.
Source: http://tiny.cc/YYXjE
I don’t know where to begin with this guy. He need his fucking teeth kicked in. This guy is the lowest of the low.The great thing about about watching this traitor is seeing his magazine crash and burn. I don’t see this guy being at the helm of this magazine much longer, but the way the left-media operates, who knows?
There is no question that Meacham is a far-left guy. He wants the Bush administration investigated over the treatment of terrorist detainees. He and his ilk don’t give a damn about how this weakens the country. Of course these fools are so clueless that they believe just the opposite will happen. It’s interesting to watch Meacham tell O’reilly that he isn’t being vindictive in his pursuit of an investigation. I think it is clear though, that this man hates conservatives and conservatism. But he never lets the veil of the calm, cool, and collected scholar ever fall away. In this respect he reminds me of Obama. They both have this warped, detached manor. Obama’s detachment was on full display as Jill Stanek described to him how she held a tiny aborted baby for forty five minutes while it’s life slowly ebbed away. Of course, this testimony didn’t faze Obama one bit as he went on to fight tooth and nail against anti-infanticide legislation in the Illinois senate.
At the end of the segment O’reilly asks Meacham why Newsweek had to publish a commentary that attacked Mel Gibson over his pending divorce and that gossiped about the possibility that there is another woman. Meacham says that Gibson put him out there as a Biblical literalist and apparently this makes him fair game for the left-wing goon squads. Sure Jonnyboy, you don’t hate conservatives. Newsweek couldn’t get anymore evenhanded, could it? Somehow, I think there is a very hot place reserved in hell for this faux-Christian S.O.B.

Here are some interesting quotes I found from Hilary Clinton and Planned Parenthood founder and eugenicist Margaret Sanger. Enjoy.
Hilary Clinton:
“I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision… when I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions, I am really in awe of her….”
Margaret Sanger:
On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
“…human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ’spawning… human beings who never should have been born.” Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people
On sterilization & racial purification:
Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial “purification,” couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.
On the right of married couples to bear children:
Couples should be required to submit applications to have a child, she wrote in her “Plan for Peace.” Birth Control Review, April 1932
On the purpose of birth control:
The purpose in promoting birth control was “to create a race of thoroughbreds,” she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)
On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities:
“More children from the fit, less from the unfit — that is the chief aim of birth control.” Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12
On the extermination of blacks:
“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” she said, “if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon
On respecting the rights of the mentally ill:
In her “Plan for Peace,” Sanger outlined her strategy for eradication of those she deemed “feebleminded.” Among the steps included in her evil scheme were immigration restrictions; compulsory sterilization; segregation to a lifetime of farm work; etc. Birth Control Review, April 1932, p. 107
On adultery:
A woman’s physical satisfaction was more important than any marriage vow, Sanger believed. Birth Control in America, p. 11
On marital sex:
“The marriage bed is the most degenerating influence in the social order,” Sanger said. (p. 23) [Quite the opposite of God’s view on the matter: “Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled; but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.” (Hebrews 13:4)
On abortion:
“Criminal’ abortions arise from a perverted sex relationship under the stress of economic necessity, and their greatest frequency is among married women.” The Woman Rebel - No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.
On the YMCA and YWCA:
“…brothels of the Spirit and morgues of Freedom!”), The Woman Rebel - No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.
On the Catholic Church’s view of contraception:
“…enforce SUBJUGATION by TURNING WOMAN INTO A MERE INCUBATOR.” The Woman Rebel - No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.
On Family Planning:
“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)
PLANNED PARENTHOOD TODAY
“We are not going to be an organization promoting celibacy or chastity.”
Faye Wattleton, President, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Los Angeles Times, Oct. 17, 1986
_______
“If your parents are stupid enough to deny you access to birth control, and you are under 18, you can get it on your own. Call Planned Parenthood.”
Planned Parenthood advertisement, Dallas Observer, Jan. 30, 1986
_______
“There are only 2 basic kinds of sex: sex with victims and sex without. Sex with victims is always wrong. Sex without is ALWAYS right.”
You’ve Changed The Combination, Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Denver, Colo.
_______
“The question of whether or not to sell ourselves to men is a false one: The real question is how to sell ourselves in the way that is least destructive to ourselves and our sisters. Prostitutes don’t need our condescension. What they need is our alliance. And we need theirs.”
The New Our Bodies, Ourselves, Boston Women’s Health Collective, p 113
_______
“Sex is too important to glop up with sentiment. If you feel sexy, for heaven’s sake admit it to yourself. If the feeling and the tension bother you, you can masturbate. Masturbation cannot hurt you and it will make you feel more relaxed.”
The Perils of Puberty, Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Denver, Colo.
______
“At Planned Parenthood you can also get birth control without the consent or knowledge of your parents. So, if you are 14, 15 or 16 and you come to Planned Parenthood, we won’t tell your parents you’ve been there. We swear we won’t tell your parents.”
Planned Parenthood employee lecturing students of Ramona High School, Riverside, Calif., April 21-22, 1986
PLANNED PARENTHOOD TODAY
“We are not going to be an organization promoting celibacy or chastity.”
Faye Wattleton, President, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Los Angeles Times, Oct. 17, 1986
_______
“If your parents are stupid enough to deny you access to birth control, and you are under 18, you can get it on your own. Call Planned Parenthood.”
Planned Parenthood advertisement, Dallas Observer, Jan. 30, 1986
_______
“There are only 2 basic kinds of sex: sex with victims and sex without. Sex with victims is always wrong. Sex without is ALWAYS right.”
You’ve Changed The Combination, Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Denver, Colo.
_______
“The question of whether or not to sell ourselves to men is a false one: The real question is how to sell ourselves in the way that is least destructive to ourselves and our sisters. Prostitutes don’t need our condescension. What they need is our alliance. And we need theirs.”
The New Our Bodies, Ourselves, Boston Women’s Health Collective, p 113
_______
“Sex is too important to glop up with sentiment. If you feel sexy, for heaven’s sake admit it to yourself. If the feeling and the tension bother you, you can masturbate. Masturbation cannot hurt you and it will make you feel more relaxed.”
The Perils of Puberty, Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Denver, Colo.
______
“At Planned Parenthood you can also get birth control without the consent or knowledge of your parents. So, if you are 14, 15 or 16 and you come to Planned Parenthood, we won’t tell your parents you’ve been there. We swear we won’t tell your parents.”
Planned Parenthood employee lecturing students of Ramona High School, Riverside, Calif., April 21-22, 1986
_________
All quotes taken from Diane Dew’s website: http://www.dianedew.com/sanger.htm

McCain is on Neil Cavuto’s show right now and I just heard him basically say, “Reagan? Aaah, he’s old school.” And then he went on to to say what a great choice for CIA director Leon Panetta is. This is the guy that Dick Morris say is an ideological leftist who will go in there and gut the agency. Is there any question now in anybody’s mind what a moron John McCain is? Anybody who thinks that the Republican party didn’t dodge a bullet when this guy blew the election, doesn’t know what the hell they are talking about.
Line of the day:
Code Pink: the antiwar, anti-deodorant group.
I wish I had taken notes on this idiot to knock him down point by point. I guess I do have to give the guy some credit for possibly getting some things right. But its hard to be interested in any of that when you have to sit through his revisionist history.
The part of Meet the Press that really got to me was Woodward putting all the blame on the President for divisiveness when San Fran Nan came to him and supposedly tried to work with him and the President basically said that his mind was made up. Listen Bob, there are two glaring facts here bud. Number one, Pelosi is a left-wing extremist and, two, the President was right about the surge. So, what exactly was the President suppose to work on with this ant-war left-coast bitch? Hmmm? Well, I guess that doesn’t matter to a guy with a liberal agenda, now, does it Bobby. In fact, I’m sure none of the incessant attacks on the President which started right after 9/11 mean much of anything to you, right, jerkoff? Ok, for a little history lesson little Bobby, pick up David Horowitz’s book “Party of Defeat” and try to squeeze a novel thought into that liberal wasteland between your ears.

| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jun | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |






Recent Comments